-
Hurt, L. E., Wiener, R. L., Russell, B. L., & Mannen, R. K. (1999). Gender differences in evaluating social-sexual conduct in the workplace. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 413-433.
-
Wiener, R. L., (2003). Death penalty research in Nebraska: How do judges and juries reach penalty decisions? Nebraska Law Review, 81, 301-320.
-
Wiener, R. L., Eton, D., Gibbons, V. P., Goldner, J. A., & Johnson, S. H. (1998). A preliminary analysis of medical futility decision making: Law and professional attitudes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 497-508.
-
Wiener, R. L., & Gutek, B. Introduction to advances in sexual harassment research, theory, and policy (1999). In R. Wiener & B. Gutek (Eds.), Advances in Sexual Harassment Research, Theory, and Policy. Special Edition of Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 540-556.
-
Wiener, R. L., Hackney, A., Kadela, K., Rauch, S., Seib, H., Warren, L. ,& Hurt, L. E. (2002). The fit and implementation of sexual harassment law to workplace evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 747-764.
-
Wiener, R. L., & Hurt, L. E. (2000). How do people evaluate social-sexual conduct: A psycholegal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 75-85.
-
Wiener, R. L., & Hurt, L. E. (1999). An interdisciplinary approach to understanding social sexual conduct at work. In R. Wiener & B. Gutek (Eds.), Advances in Sexual Harassment Research, Theory, and Policy. Special Edition of Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 556-595.
-
Wiener, R. L., & Hurt, L. E. (1997). Social sexual conduct at work: How do workers know when it is harassment and when it is not? California Western Law Review, 34, 53-99.
-
Wiener, R. L., Hurt, L. E., Russell, B., Mannen, K., & Gasper, C. (1997). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 71-93.
-
Wiener, R. L., Hurt, L. E., Thomas, S. L., Sadler, M. S., Bauer, C. A., & Sargent, T. M. (1998). The role of declarative and procedural knowledge in capital murder sentencing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 124-144.
-
Wiener, R. L., Richmond, T. L., Seib, H. M., Rauch, S. M., & Hackney, A. A. (2002). The psychology of telling murder stories: Do we think in scripts, exemplars, or prototypes? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 119-139.
-
Wiener, R. L., & Stolle, D. P. (1997). Trial consulting: Jurors' and attorneys' perceptions of murder? California Western Law Review, 34, 225-243.
Wiener, R. L., Rogers, M., Winter, R., Hurt, L. E., Hackney, A., Kadela, K., Seib, H., Rauch, S., Warren, L., & Morasco, B. (2004). Guided jury discretion in capital murder cases: The role of declarative and procedural knowledge. In R. Wiener & C. Haney (Eds.), Psychological Research, Commentary, and Practice and the Death Penalty. Special Edition of Psychology, Public Policy, and Law.
Wiener, R. L., Winter, R., Rogers, M., Seib, H., Rauch, S. Kadela, K., Hackney, A., & Warren, L. (2002). Evaluating published research in psychology and law: A gatekeeper analysis of law and human behavior. In J. R. P. Ogloff (Ed.), Taking Psychology and Law into the Twenty First Century (pp. 416- 435). New York: Kluwer/Plenum Publishers.